The United States government is moving forward with a proposal that would require foreign tourists to disclose five years of social media history before being permitted to enter the country under the Visa Waiver Program, a move officials say is necessary for national security but which critics warn could have far-reaching consequences for privacy and free expression. The proposal was announced by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), a branch of the Department of Homeland Security, and published for public review earlier this week.
According to AP News, a DHS official defended the expanded screening as an essential modernization of border-security tools. “This information helps us identify potential threats before they ever reach the United States,” the official said, noting that social media has increasingly become a platform where extremist affiliations and harmful intent are sometimes expressed. The official added that the requirement aligns with the department’s “commitment to detecting risks early and preventing individuals with dangerous backgrounds from entering.”
The new measure would apply to citizens from 42 countries—mostly in Europe and the Asia-Pacific—who are currently allowed to enter the U.S. for up to 90 days without a visa using the Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA). Under the proposal, applicants would be asked to provide usernames associated with their social media accounts over the past five years, along with historical email addresses, phone numbers, and, when available, biometric identifiers.
Criticism from Digital Rights Groups
However, the plan has drawn sharp backlash from civil-liberty advocates who argue that the expansion amounts to an unprecedented intrusion into the personal lives of travelers. Speaking to The Guardian, Patrick Toomey of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) expressed concern that the proposal could have a chilling effect on online speech. “When people know that a government—especially a foreign government—may scrutinize their posts, jokes, satire, political opinions, or even harmless comments, it changes the way they speak online,” Toomey said. “This proposal risks turning social media into a tool of surveillance rather than communication.”
Toomey also warned that the screening could disproportionately affect users who come from countries with different languages, cultural contexts, or political dynamics. “A post that makes sense to someone in Tokyo or Berlin might be misinterpreted by a U.S. official reading it through a completely different lens,” he said. “The potential for misunderstanding is enormous.”
Other privacy advocates interviewed by The Guardian echoed the sentiment, raising the concern that the U.S. may effectively be collecting data on individuals who did not consent—such as friends or comment authors on a traveler’s profile—simply because their interactions appear in a public feed.
The timing has also raised eyebrows among business and tourism groups. AP News reported that the travel industry fears the proposal could discourage millions of prospective visitors, especially ahead of major international events where the U.S. expects an influx of foreign tourists. Tourism analysts interviewed by AP warned that such requirements could create “significant friction” in travel planning, potentially shifting tourists toward destinations viewed as more privacy-protective.
Some European officials have already signaled that reciprocal policies could be considered if the U.S. moves forward—raising the possibility of a global increase in digital-screening demands.
Government Response
Responding to the backlash, DHS maintains that participation in the Visa Waiver Program is voluntary, and that travelers who object to sharing their digital history may instead apply for a traditional visa—an option critics say is not a real choice, given the long processing times and higher costs.
The proposal has now entered a mandatory 60-day public comment period, during which individuals, organizations, and foreign governments are allowed to submit formal objections or modifications. DHS officials told AP News that all comments would be reviewed before the rule is finalized, but offered no timeline for when the new requirements might take effect.
If implemented, the policy would represent one of the most sweeping expansions of digital data collection on foreign travelers in U.S. history—marking a significant shift in how governments view the intersection of border control, technology, and personal expression. (Sulung Prasetyo)
Read also:
From mountains to oceans, delivered to you. Follow us on Lingkar Bumi WhatsApp Channel.
